Debunking A Moral Landscape takes on the ideas of Sam Harris using his own chosen tools -- namely, reason and science. When those tools are turned back on his book, The Moral Landscape, one comes to understand that his perspective is very much like an onion since, after one peels away the various decaying layers of philosophy, reasoning, and science, there is really nothing left at the heart of his worldview. Sam Harris has been raised by many his many followers and admirers to an emperor-like status. Nonetheless, in reality, this would-be emperor has no genuine clothes of royalty since the material from which his conceptual garments are woven are fairly common, if not threadbare. In fact, his ideas are clothed in a way that gives them the appearance of being fashioned in a very sturdy and reliable manner, but such appearances are little more than an illusion. He often claims that his kingdom is ruled through reason and science. Yet, when the topography of his ideas are carefully explored, there are many problems to be found hiding in the nooks and crannies of his thought processes. His reasoning is not always rational; his science is not always factual; and his explanations are often problematic. Furthermore, he asserts that faith is for the naive and foolish, but his perspective is glued together by a variety of different grades of faith -- some of them quite faulty -- which he calls by other names such as: well-being, probability, theory, hypothesis, science, randomness, evolution, neurobiology, reason, and so on. Sam Harris has harsh words for religious extremists -- as well he should. However, he apparently fails to understand how his own position incorporates a brand of irreligious fundamentalism that is inclined to be just as blind and unyielding as the religious people whom he wishes to criticize. Debunking A Moral Landscape doesn't just criticize the perspective which is developed in Sam Harris' latest book, The Moral Landscape, the former book introduces a variety of constructive ideas with respect to moral philosophy, political philosophy, evolution, science, the process of reasoning, and methodology that grows out of the process through which the problems and errors that are present in Sam Harris' The Moral Landscape are corrected and refined.

In recent years, the intellectual landscape has seen an increasing influence of atheistic thinkers who rigorously challenge religious beliefs. Among these voices, Sam Harris stands out for his wide-ranging critique that spans issues from free will to morality, and from consciousness to religion. His ideas, extensively publicized in best-selling books like "The End of Faith," "The Moral Landscape," and others, have garnered a significant following. For the average Christian who may not be familiar with complex theological or philosophical concepts, Harris's arguments may seem insurmountable. But is the case against Christianity that Harris presents truly undefeatable? This book, "Refuting Sam Harris: A Christian Apologist's Guide," aims to delve into the primary assertions made by Harris and to scrutinize them from a Christian worldview. This is not just another book that preaches to the choir. Instead, we will objectively analyze Harris's arguments and counter them where they fall short, providing a robust defense for the Christian faith.

‘Mountains of Ignorance' is a critical exploration of the published dialogue between Sam Harris and Maajid Nawaz entitled: 'Islam and the Future of Tolerance'. Dr. Harris claims that he is interested in peace, harmony, co-operation, and tolerance. Yet, when it comes to Islam and Muslims, he does not appear to exhibit the same commitment to, or fervor for, the aforementioned ideals. More specifically, Dr. Harris seems to be willing to recklessly endanger innocent lives – both Muslim and non-Muslims – by fraudulently promoting a false idea about the nature of Islam, and this seems rather incongruous with some of his stated values. One can’t help but wonder what his underlying motives actually are because there seems to be little rhyme or reason to his insistence on maintaining such a jaundiced and factually challenged view of Islam unless his purpose is something other than peace, harmony, co-operation, tolerance, and the like. The fact that Dr. Harris appears to be willing to identify fundamentalists, extremists, and militants as constituting the only “true” Muslims, while referring to other non-violent Muslims as acting out of disingenuous and hypocritical pretense (simply because the latter individuals refuse to accept the delusional and ignorant ranting of fundamentalists) also causes one to wonder what the actual underlying motives of Dr. Harris are. Dr. Harris and Maajid Nawaz present themselves as individuals who have understanding of, and insight into, the nature of Islam. But they do not possess such understanding or insight, and the present book: Mountains of Ignorance' documents the foregoing contention.

This book explores the significance of a saying of the Prophet Muhammad -- namely, "Die before you die" -- from the perspective of an individual who has been journeying along a path of discovery for more than 50 years. The contents of this book might be one of the most unique, intriguing, and challenging accounts of Islam and the Sufi path that has been published in North America. Just a little over a year ago, the author of this book died -- several times -- in the emergency room of a local hospital. This book starts with those events and, then, expands outward to talk about an array of experiences (including spiritual abuse) that has shaped his understanding of Islam, the Sufi path, life, ands himself. In addition, the book critically reflects on a series of issues that have relevance in today's world. These ideas range from: Sam Harris, to topics such as: Education, religion, mysticism, science, and shari'ah. While each of the book’s four sections has something to offer readers with respect to assisting a person to work toward developing a deeper understanding of Islam and its mystical dimension (as well as a number of other topics), the book's section on shari'ah might prove to be the most illuminating and thought-provoking facet of the book. More specifically, Dr. Whitehouse introduces readers to a way of engaging the topic of shari'ah that is quite different from what is normally thought of in conjunction with that term and, if God wishes, could serve as a way of helping to bring the Muslim world and the West closer together in a variety of constructive and harmonious ways.

This anthology offers a unique collection of contributions focusing on the discussion about the so-called dual-process theories within the field of moral psychology. In general, dual-process theories state that in cognitive systems, two sorts of processes can be differentiated: an affective, associative process and an analytical, rule-based process. This distinction recently entered the debate on the relationship between intuitive and rational approaches to explaining the phenomenon of moral judgment. The increasing interest in these theories raises questions concerning their general impact on social contexts. The anthology aims at presenting stepping-stones of an analysis of the merits and drawbacks of this development. For that purpose, the authors discuss general questions concerning the relationship between ethics and empirical sciences, methodological questions, reassessments of established terminology and societal implications of dual-process theories in moral psychology.

In recent years, few voices have been as influential in the debate over the existence of God and the value of religion as Richard Dawkins. A distinguished biologist, Dawkins has used his scientific acumen to critique religious faith in works such as "The God Delusion." But it is necessary to ask: Does Dawkins present an unassailable argument? Is faith truly the "delusion" he claims it to be? In "Debunking Dawkins - A Christian Response," we seek to answer these questions and offer a thoughtful, reasoned counter-argument to the claims of Dawkins and the New Atheist movement. The intellectual tussle between science and faith is not new. However, Dawkins has contributed a layer of fervor to this longstanding debate, portraying religion as not just incorrect, but actively harmful. This book is not an attack on Dawkins as a person or a scientist, but a critical examination of his arguments against religious belief, particularly Christianity.

Voltaire’s ideas were profoundly shaped by Enlightenment thinkers, including those who championed Deism—a belief in a distant, uninvolved creator. However, the cognitive biases that Voltaire displayed, such as his predisposition to favor secularism and his antagonism towards organized religion, led him to overlook the moral and existential truths that Christianity provides. Through critical examination, we will highlight these cognitive biases and the logical errors in his philosophical system. For instance, one major logical flaw in Voltaire’s reasoning is his simplistic association of religious belief with the abuses of religious institutions. By conflating institutional corruption with the essence of Christian teaching, Voltaire erected a straw man that is easily dismantled. Similarly, Voltaire’s hermeneutic approach—his interpretation of sacred texts—reveals numerous errors. He often misrepresented or misunderstood biblical passages, failing to grasp the historical and theological context within which they were written. Furthermore, Voltaire’s understanding of science, though ahead of his time in some respects, was incomplete. His critique of miracles, for example, rested on a narrow view of natural laws that contemporary science has since expanded. Voltaire’s critiques of Christianity in light of science often relied on outdated or superficial scientific concepts, which we will examine in later chapters.

In the contemplative shadow of Christopher Hitchens' intellectual legacy, there stands a multitude of voices, ready to engage with the spirited critiques he presented against religious belief. "Debunking Hitchens: A Christian Response" is not merely a book; it is a comprehensive, systematic Christian response to the sharp arguments laid down by one of the most formidable atheists of our time. The literary and philosophical armoury of Hitchens has compelled many to reconsider the foundations of faith. However, in the midst of these thought-provoking challenges, a path emerges for Christians not just to respond, but to delve deeper into the essence of their convictions.

Title: Debunking Lawrence Krauss: A Christian Response Are you fascinated by the cosmic mysteries that surround our existence? Have you ever pondered the clash between faith and science, particularly in the age of outspoken physicist Lawrence Krauss? If so, "Debunking Lawrence Krauss: A Christian Response" is the book you've been waiting for, offering the answers you've always wanted to know but perhaps never dared to ask. Are you curious about the foundations of atheistic cosmology, as presented by Lawrence Krauss in his groundbreaking work, "A Universe from Nothing"? Dr. Samuel James takes you on a compelling journey through the flaws in Krauss's arguments, providing a meticulous analysis that challenges assumptions and invites critical thinking. Have you ever wondered whether the Big Bang is a divine spark or a cosmic coincidence? "Debunking Lawrence Krauss" explores the heart of this cosmic clash, dissecting the implications of the Big Bang theory and its alignment with religious beliefs or scientific inquiry. Are you intrigued by the concept of fine-tuning in the universe? Dr. James delves into the symphony of design versus a random melody, unraveling the complexities that surround the precision and balance observed in the cosmos. Are you searching for answers regarding the Anthropic Principle and whether humanity is a product of purposeful design or a mere lucky accident? This book navigates through these profound questions, offering insights that challenge preconceived notions. Are you wrestling with the age-old problem of evil and its compatibility with faith and science? "Debunking Lawrence Krauss" confronts this dilemma head-on, exploring whether a harmonious coexistence between faith and science can provide solace in the face of human suffering. Are you intrigued by the moral implications of atheism and its ability to ground morality on stable foundations? Dr. James carefully examines the moral landscape, questioning whether atheism stands on solid ground or if its foundations are built on precarious sand. In "Debunking Lawrence Krauss," Dr. Samuel James not only addresses these questions but also invites you into a harmonious dialogue between faith and science. This book is more than a debunking; it's an exploration of the profound intersections of belief and scientific inquiry. Available on Apple Books, it's your opportunity to unravel the mysteries of the universe and discover a deeper understanding of your place within it.

Bertrand Russell remains a towering figure in the annals of modern philosophy, logic, and critical thinking. His contributions span multiple disciplines, from mathematics to social advocacy. Yet, Russell is also well-known for his vehement critique of religious beliefs, most notably Christianity. His work, "Why I Am Not a Christian," stands as an emblem of his skepticism, challenging the tenets of Christianity from a logical standpoint. But what if Russell's skepticism was subject to its own critique? What if his arguments against Christianity failed the very tests of logic, coherence, and ethical substance that he himself had set? This book, "Debunking Bertrand Russell: A Christian Response," aims to unravel the multiple dimensions of Russell's skepticism towards Christianity and counter them from a Christian worldview. The intention is not to diminish Russell's monumental contributions to human thought but to subject them to the kind of rigorous analysis that Russell himself advocated. The Christian response to Russell's skepticism is not an endeavor to propagate dogma but an intellectual exercise in the search for truth. Russell advocated for a worldview based on evidence and reason, yet his own arguments against Christianity often falter in these very aspects. This book seeks to hold Russell's critiques to account, dissecting them on their logical merits, moral implications, and ontological assumptions. Each chapter in this book will tackle a significant aspect of Russell's thought, dissecting it, and offering a counter-argument from a Christian perspective. From his most famous work, "Why I Am Not a Christian," to his views on morality, love, and even his contributions to logic and mathematics, no stone will be left unturned.