The objects of the American Meteorological Society are "the development and dissemination of knowledge of meteorology in all its phases and applications, and the advancement of its professional ideals." The organization of the Society took place in affiliation with the American Association for the Advancement of Science at Saint Louis, Missouri, December 29, 1919, and its incorporation, at Washington, D. C., January 21, 1920. The work of the Society is carried on by the Bulletin, the Journal, and Meteorological Monographs, by papers and discussions at meetings of the Society, through the offices of the Secretary and the Executive Secretary, and by correspondence. All of the Americas are represented in the membership of the Society as well as many foreign countries.

More accurate forecasts of climate conditions over time periods of weeks to a few years could help people plan agricultural activities, mitigate drought, and manage energy resources, amongst other activities; however, current forecast systems have limited ability on these time- scales. Models for such climate forecasts must take into account complex interactions among the ocean, atmosphere, and land surface. Such processes can be difficult to represent realistically. To improve the quality of forecasts, this book makes recommendations about the development of the tools used in forecasting and about specific research goals for improving understanding of sources of predictability. To improve the accessibility of these forecasts to decision-makers and researchers, this book also suggests best practices to improve how forecasts are made and disseminated.

Assessment of the performance of the National Meteorological Center's (NMC) new Eta numerical weather prediction model requires objective evaluation through direct comparison of model forecast output to its own analysis and to the analysis of other numerical models. The ultimate goal of the Eta Model is to provide accurate mesoscale weather forecasts through the late 1990's which are superior to those currently provided by the older NGM. To accurately evaluate the Eta Model, several model forecast output fields were compared to the NGM for a common population of extratropical cyclones over a period of five months. The separate model forecasts were also evaluated against their own analysis. Selected fields included central sea level pressure. 12h central pressure change 1000-500 mb thickness at the cyclone center, and both convective and total precipitation at the cyclone center. Results indicated a consistent negative bias in forecast central pressure values for the NGM. and a positive bias for the Eta Model. Mean forecast position errors were nearly identical for both models through 36h with the Eta forecast position errors only slightly larger at 48h. Both models exhibited a slight cold bias in 1000-500 mb thickness fields at the cyclone centers with the NGM being greater. The Eta Model tended to forecast more precipitation in general and in particular the precipitation was higher for stable precipitation.

First published in 2003. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.