A report on high-risk problems faced by the government, to help the 106th Congress in crafting its oversight and legislative agenda. Chapters: addressing urgent Year 2000 computing challenge; resolving serious information security weaknesses; ensuring major technology investments improve services; providing basic financial accountability; reducing inordinate program management risks; and managing large procurement operations more efficiently. Appendix I: chronology of high-risk designations. Appendix II: key contacts for high-risk areas.

The fed. gov¿t. is the world's largest and most complex entity, with about $3 trillion in outlays in FY 2008. Reports on high-risk areas bring focus to areas needing attention due to their greater vulnerabilities to fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement. These reports also identify areas needing transformation to address major economy, efficiency, or effectiveness challenges. This 2009 update presents the status of high-risk areas listed in 2007 and identifies new high-risk areas. Solutions to high-risk problems offer the potential to save billions of dollars, dramatically improve service to the public, strengthen confidence and trust in the performance and accountability of the U.S. gov¿t., and ensure the ability of gov¿t. to deliver on its promises. Illus.

A report on high-risk problems faced by the government, to help the Congress in crafting its oversight and legislative agenda. High-Risk Areas in 2003 include: Addressing Challenges in Broad-based Transformations; Ensuring Major Technology Investments Improve Services; Providing Basic Financial Accountability; Reducing Inordinate Program Management Risks; and Managing Large Procurement Operations More Efficiently. Charts and tables.

In Jan. 2003, fed. real property was designated as a high-risk area because of long-standing problems with excess and underutilized property, deteriorating facilities, unreliable real property data, over-reliance on costly leasing, and security challenges. In Jan. 2009, it was found that agencies have taken some positive steps to address real property issues but that some of the core problems persist. This testimony focuses on: (1) progress made by major real property-holding agencies to strategically manage real property; (2) ongoing problems regarding agencies' efforts to address real property issues; and (3) underlying obstacles identified as hampering agencies' real property reform efforts governmentwide. Illustrations.