David Ricardo’s theories were introduced in fragments in Japan after the Meiji restoration of 1868 and his work came into prominence late in comparison to other major thinkers figuring in the history of economic thought. The book seeks to analyse the studies in Japan from the year 1920 to the end of the 1930s – during the time before the outbreak of the Second World War, when even the study of classical economics became difficult. The book covers different aspects of his works and contains elements which may be interesting to foreign and even Japanese readers today without necessarily coming under the influence of Marx’s reading. It presents works on Ricardo that are at present, wholly unknown to the Ricardo scholars and more generally to the historians of economic thought outside Japan. This book is an essential read on the history of economic thought in Japan.

This book is a coherent and unique collection of chapters exploring the reception and diffusion of David Ricardo’s writings in different languages. The book highlights the similarities and differences between them. This book seeks to delineate the diffusion of Ricardo's theory in various parts of Europe and Japan. While there may have been case studies about the reception of Ricardo’s thoughts for several countries, there has not yet been a systematic study of the diffusion process under consideration as a whole. This book caters to all scholars dedicated to the history of economic thought and to students who are interested to learn about the peculiarities of the evolution of economic theories in different countries. This book is the first of its kind, with no known predecessor, and it aims to shed light on how and why some of Ricardo’s writings were picked up and why others were not. Given Ricardo’s importance in the field of economics, the book will be of interest to many.

David Ricardo’s theories were introduced in fragments in Japan after the Meiji restoration of 1868 and his work came into prominence late in comparison to other major thinkers figuring in the history of economic thought. The book seeks to analyse the studies in Japan from the year 1920 to the end of the 1930s – during the time before the outbreak of the Second World War, when even the study of classical economics became difficult. The book covers different aspects of his works and contains elements which may be interesting to foreign and even Japanese readers today without necessarily coming under the influence of Marx’s reading. It presents works on Ricardo that are at present, wholly unknown to the Ricardo scholars and more generally to the historians of economic thought outside Japan. This book is an essential read on the history of economic thought in Japan.

The book seeks to analyse Ricardo's works from the year 1920 to the end of the 1930s - during the time of the outbreak of the Second World War, when even the study of classical economics became difficult. The book covers different aspects of his works and contains elements which may be interesting to foreign and even Japanese readers today without necessarily coming under the influence of Marx's reading. It presents Ricardo's work that is at present, wholly unknown to the Ricardo scholars and more generally to the historians of economic thought outside Japan.

A collection of essays, almost all published in the 1990s, reconsidering economic thought in light of modern theory. Discusses contributions made both in classical school and marginal revolution literature which are still significant to modern economic theory, and those heralding from Japan which have lacked exposure in the West. Articles are grouped in sections on theory and history, classical economics, Marxian economics, and neo-classical and Keynesian economics. Specific topics include Japanese studies of Ricardo's theory of foreign trade, unequal exchange and exploitation, and Sraffa and the microfoundations of Keynes. Negishi is affiliated with the University of Tokyo, Japan. Annotation copyrighted by Book News Inc., Portland, OR

The age of the contemplative economist-scholar—at home equally in classical languages, economic history, the history of ideas, and mathematical theory—has passed. The history of economics as a subdiscipline has lost touch with the mainstream study of economics. InThe Future of the History of Economics, internationally known scholars from ten countries provide a comparative assessment of the subdiscipline. The twenty-six chapters address different national traditions, journals, professional meetings, graduate and undergraduate education, the socialization of new members of the disciplinary community, economic heterodoxy, and connections to other scholarly communities. Contributors. Roger E. Backhouse, Bradley W. Bateman, Mark Blaug, Peter J. Boettke, Anthony Brewer, Derek S. Brown, José Luís Cardoso, John B. Davis, Ghislain Deleplace, Sheila C. Dow, Ross Emmett, Evelyn L. Forget, Ted Gayer, Craufurd D. Goodwin, Aiko Ikeo, Albert Jolink, Matthias Klaes, John Lodewijks, Maria Cristina Marcuzzo, Stephen Meardon, Steven Medema, Philip Mirowski, Annalisa Rosselli, Shauna Saunders, Margaret Schabas, Bertram Schefold, Esther-Mirjam Sent, E. Roy Weintraub The Future of the History of Economicsis the 2002 supplement to the journalHistory of Political Economy. All 2002 subscribers will receive a copy as a part of their annual subscription