This issue of the Yale Law Journal (the third issue of academic year 2015-2016) features articles and essays by notable scholars, as well as extensive student research. Contents include: • Article, "Corporate Control and Idiosyncratic Vision," by Zohar Goshen & Assaf Hamdani • Essay, "The Domestic Analogy Revisited: Hobbes on International Order," by David Singh Grewal • Note, "Repairing the Irreparable: Revisiting the Federalism Decisions of the Burger Court," by David Scott Louk • Note, "Reconciling the Crime of Aggression and Complementarity: Unaddressed Tensions and a Way Forward," by Julie Veroff • Comment, "Unpacking Wolf Packs," by Carmen X.W. Lu • Comment, "Jurisdictional Rules and Final Agency Action," by Sundeep Iyer Quality digital edition includes active Contents for the issue and for individual articles, linked footnotes, active URLs in notes, and proper digital and Bluebook presentation from the original edition.

This issue of the Yale Law Journal (the fifth issue of academic year 2015-2016) features articles and essays by notable scholars, as well as extensive student research. The contents include: "Governance Reform and the Judicial Role in Municipal Bankruptcy," by Clayton P. Gillette & David A. Skeel, Jr. "Professional Speech," by Claudia E. Haupt "Casey and the Clinic Closings: When 'Protecting Health' Obstructs Choice," by Linda Greenhouse & Reva B. Siegel "Returning to Common-Law Principles of Insider Trading After United States v. Newman," by Richard A. Epstein The student contributions are: Note, "Will Putting Cameras on Police Reduce Polarization?," by Roseanna Sommers Note, "Federal Questions and the Domestic-Relations Exception," by Bradley G. Silverman Comment, "Toward an Efficient Licensing and Rate-Setting Regime: Reconstructing § 114(i) of the Copyright Act," by Joseph Pomianowski Quality digital editions include active Contents for the issue and for individual articles, linked footnotes, active URLs in notes, and proper digital and Bluebook presentation from the original edition.

This issue of the Yale Law Journal include these contents: • Essay, "Fiduciary Political Theory: A Critique," by Ethan J. Leib and Stephen R. Galoob • Note, "The Modification of Decrees in the Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court," by James G. Mandilk In addition, the issue includes an extensive collection of Features by leading scholars, entitled "A Conversation on Title IX," growing out of an event sponsored by the Journal. Contributors include Michelle J. Anderson, Adele P. Kimmel, Catharine A. MacKinnon, Dana Bolger, Zoe Ridolfi-Starr, and Alyssa Peterson & Olivia Ortiz. Subjects of these essays include institutional liability, costs of liability and schools' financial obligations, transparency in campus reporting, adjudicative processes, and using Title IX for preventing the bullying of LGBT students. This is the seventh issue of academic year 2015-2016. Quality formatting includes linked notes and an active Table of Contents (including linked Contents for individual articles), as well as active URLs in footnotes and proper Bluebook style.

This issue of the Yale Law Journal (the sixth issue of academic year 2015-2016) features articles and essays by notable scholars, as well as extensive student research. The issue's contents include: Article, "Administrative Forbearance," by Daniel T. Deacon Essay, "The New Public," by Sarah A. Seo The student contributions are: Note, "How To Trim a Christmas Tree: Beyond Severability and Inseverability for Omnibus Statutes," by Robert L. Nightingale Note, "Border Checkpoints and Substantive Due Process: Abortion in the Border Zone," by Kate Huddleston Comment, "The State's Right to Property Under International Law," by Peter Tzeng Quality digital editions include active Contents for the issue and for individual articles, linked footnotes, active URLs in notes, and proper digital and Bluebook presentation from the original edition.

This issue of the Yale Law Journal (the fourth issue of academic year 2015-2016) features articles and essays by notable scholars, as well as extensive student research. The issue is dedicated to the memory of Professor Robert A. Burt, with essays in his honor by Robert Post, Owen Fiss, Monroe Price, Martha Minow, Martin Boehmer, Anthony Kronman, Frank Iacobucci, and Andrew David Burt. In addition, the issue's contents include: • Article, "The First Patent Litigation Explosion," Christopher Beauchamp • Article, "The Lost 'Effects' of the Fourth Amendment: Giving Personal Property Due Protection," Maureen E. Brady • Note, "Fifty Shades of Gray: Sentencing Trends in Major White-Collar Cases," Jillian Hewitt • Note, "Present at Antitrust's Creation: Consumer Welfare in the Sherman Act's State Statutory Forerunners," Charles S. Dameron • Comment, "In Defense of 'Free Houses,'" Megan Wachspress, Jessie Agatstein, and Christian Mott • Comment, "Tort Concepts in Traffic Crimes," Noah M. Kazis Quality digital editions include active Contents for the issue and for individual articles, linked footnotes, active URLs in notes, and proper digital and Bluebook presentation from the original edition.

The contents for this January 2018 issue of the Harvard Law Review, Number 3 of Volume 131, include: • Article, "The Endgame of Administrative Law: Governmental Disobedience and the Judicial Contempt Power," by Nicholas R. Parrillo • Book Review, "Rethinking Autocracy at Work," by Cynthia Estlund • Note, "Congressional Intent to Preclude Equitable Relief — Ex Parte Young After Armstrong" • Note, "Sixth Amendment Challenge to Courthouse Dress Codes" • Note, "The Virtues of Heterogeneity, in Court Decisions and the Constitution" In addition, the issue features student commentary on Recent Cases and other legal actions, including such subjects as: standing in class actions for credit reporting; right of access of press re Guantanamo Bay detainees; parolees and disability rights under the ADA; intent and manslaughter by encouraging suicide; proposed legislation to ameliorate punitive effects of drug crimes involving marijuana; and President Trump's tweets purporting to ban transgender servicemembers in the military. Finally, the issue includes summaries of Recent Publications. The Harvard Law Review is offered in a quality digital edition (since 2011), featuring active Contents, linked footnotes, active URLs, legible tables, and proper ebook and Bluebook formatting.

This book provides the first scholarly investigation of prosecutorial discretion in the International Criminal Court (ICC) from an interdisciplinary perspective. This work analyses the discretionary power of the ICC prosecutor and its scope. It explains that there is a tendency to overlook the necessity of distinguishing between the various usages of discretion when exercised as a power authorised by the law and effect when applying indeterminate legal thresholds. The author argues that the latter indeterminacy may give decision makers an unwarranted opportunity to exercise a wide range of discretion, where extra-legal factors may be considered. In comparison, prosecutorial discretion allows decision makers to consider extra-legal considerations. This book also discusses the relevance of political considerations within the decision-making process in the context of the exercise of prosecutorial discretion. It suggests that there need not be a conflict between the broad sense of justice as outlined in the Statute and political factors in giving effect to decisions. This book will be of interest to students of international law, global governance and international relations.

This report contains detailed profiles of twelve of the world’s leading platform companies and derives insights from those profiles about what platforms actually do, how they do it, and why they succeed financially.